Give and Take a Revolutionary Approach to Success Book Review

Are you a giver or a taker?

In his book Requite and Accept: A Revolutionary Approach to Success, professor Adam Grant examines the well-nigh successful individuals in a diverseness of fields and finds one thing they all take in mutual, they are givers.

Correct from the start Grant takes a moment to accost that being a giver doesn't mean giving all the time. It doesn't mean being a doormat and it doesn't hateful putting the needs of others higher up your own. Even though these seem like giving means, Grant brings combines anecdotes, research, and popular stories from history to weave a different material that the all-time workers are made out of. It's one of giving and how givers practice sure things better that bring them an extra reward.

One of the ways that givers get ahead is through meliorate networking, and non in the traditional sense of selling something to someone. Givers rather, choose to help others and because they give and requite, rather than take and take, they take a larger network. In the curt run this ways a bit of stagnation rather than moving forrard but in the long term givers come up out alee. Givers win in the long term because they build up a larger network and assistance those people get ahead. If a giver needs to call in a favor then, they have a bigger remainder of resources to draw from, and probably better results.

Grant likewise writes about how givers negotiate better than takers. In one report of educatee negotiators, the group trained equally givers got better deals for themselves and their opponents. The researchers concluded that past shifting their thinking toward one of giving, these students were able to notice creative solutions to the negotiation impasse they were at. They found things that were of high value to their opponent low toll to them. It was the research manifestation of the children fighting over the last lemon, both claiming they needed information technology. Simply after they stopped yelling and started talking, did they realize 1 needed the juice for lemonade, the other the zest for pie.

Besides communication on networking, collaborating, evaluating, and influencing, there are sections virtually avoiding burnout and non existence a chump. To help givers avert being walkovers Grant suggests many means to reframe situations, similar negotiations. Some givers in Grant's review of the research were too timid to abet for themselves. When these givers shifted their thinking from acting for themselves to interim like a mentor for themselves, they shifted into the right frame of giving. One story is of a software engineer who had high qualifications but a low bacon. When he shifted from thinking almost himself during the negotiations, to thinking about negotiating on behalf of his family he fabricated a stronger – and successful case – for why he deserved a raise.

Overall, I enjoyed Grant's book. Information technology reads like Gladwell and at times I was wondering if it suffered from some of the same conclusions of convenience, but in the end it passed the sniff test and I highly recommend it. If you enjoyed The Get-Giver by Bob Burg, James Altucher, thoughts on networking or the negotiating classic, Getting to Yes, and so Requite and Take just might exist another book to add to your reading list.

Practice yous want ideas, insights, and data on how to craft your time in just one weekly email?

Then you lot want ATTN: sent to you lot.

ATTN: is a weekly digest from Productivityist that delivers a week's worth of content in a nice little package straight to your inbox. Just enter your email to subscribe.

Success! Now bank check your e-mail to confirm your subscription.

amintoplad.blogspot.com

Source: https://productivityist.com/book-review-give-and-take/

Share this post